Jump to content

E.L.F.

Members
  • Content Count

    480
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Everything posted by E.L.F.

  1. Green and Yellow wrote the following post at 17 Dec 2016 12:06 PM: Delia Smith needs to go but is hanging around because she is a stubborn egotistical fool. I would suggest then, that you stump up your last two quid and buy the club.
  2. Crabbycanary3 wrote the following post at 17 Dec 2016 6:50 AM: Or is it just me? "..last night we were, out done, on how to play 4-2-3-1, in both attack and defence." No, your words pretty much sums it up.
  3. morty wrote the following post at 15 Dec 2016 10:16 PM: The question was "Is anyone dying from starvation in Britain?" And the answer is "No" Actually, the answer is "Yes". Britain’s benefits sanctions: ‘My brother’s gone. We can’t bring him back, but we can’t let this go on’ (https://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/dec/17/benefits-sanctions-gill-thompson-cathie-wood-vulnerable-claimants) People starving to death in the UK – on David Cameron’s doorstep (https://tompride.wordpress.com/2014/11/23/people-starving-to-death-in-the-uk-on-david-camerons-doorstep/)
  4. morty wrote the following post at 15 Dec 2016 9:48 PM: Are you thicker? Is anyone in Britain dying from starvation? Yes, people can starve in benefit-sanctions Britain (https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/dec/08/starve-benefit-sanctions-unemployed-hungry-government) The article is over 2 years old, hopefully you''ll get the gist of the overall picture.
  5. Dan Dare wrote the following post at 15 Dec 2016 9:55 PM: and a place of boundless joy that must be Oh the humanity!
  6. Dan Dare wrote the following post at 15 Dec 2016 9:52 PM: Or instead of whining out your sanctimonious shyte why not tell us why you seem to thing it''s ok to be homeless as long as they get their complimentary sleeping bag Where did I say that? Better yet, how did you interpret what I said to ask that? Just Wow
  7. I''m sitting here at home right now.
  8. morty wrote the following post at 15 Dec 2016 9:37 PM: He also donated 11,500 sleeping bags to the homeless. Shouldn''t he have done that either? Are you thick? I think that sleeping bags for those sleeping rough is brilliant. That''s meaningful because it''s about life or death at this time. Are you suggesting that toys have the same impact?
  9. Indy wrote the following post at 15 Dec 2016 9:15 PM: Can''t believe you took his bait ELF, Dan Dickhead is only trying to fish........ Now don''t bite, your point is justified in general just not aimed at a guy who has just donated a huge amount for the children. So now my point is justified. As for BOR, he made some points but I took offence to his last one.
  10. morty wrote the following post at 15 Dec 2016 9:14 PM: But hey, keep sneering anyway WT F are you on about?
  11. Dan Dare wrote the following post at 15 Dec 2016 8:23 PM: You have no knowledge of to whom these toys will be going to, or the how they live. You also presume that no one else on here is aware of the world''s inequalities, or that charities are not the real answer. But this gesture is not saying it is the answer, merely that for one specific purpose this might help. I don''t see him wandering about Africa, or standing behind some huge cheque. Just wanting to help, yes it might be misplaced, yes there are one hundred other ways that money could be spent. But there''ll be more than a hundred kids who''ll have at least one present they would otherwise not have Now grow up and stop being silly I don''t really care about the vitriol being spouted on here but don''t tell me to grow up. Only an imbecile would rate ''a toy'' as a top priority for the sound learning capabilities and health of a child, especially one who lives below the poverty line. "Alison Garnham, chief executive of the Child Poverty Action Group, said: “No one should be unable to feed themselves or their children in Britain today. To have 8.4 million people unable to eat properly shows the urgency of tackling poverty in the UK.” (https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/may/06/more-than-8-million-in-uk-struggle-to-put-food-on-table-survey-says) I find the whole notion of ''christmas'' to be absurd. As seen on this thread, the poor mean nothing to lots of people. It''s all about demeaning and patronising behaviour, so typically grown-up traits at this time.
  12. Yes, a toy is much better than a nutritious meal for those in poverty.
  13. Dan Dare wrote the following post at 15 Dec 2016 7:54 PM: who says they have empty stomachs - most may have very caring parents who make sure the children are fed and I expect those running the charity know a bit more about what is needed, than you or I What''s the poverty rate in this first-world kingdom? These caring parents might make sure their children are fed, so all is well when there is no money left for heat or lights. Don''t you think it''s time that people stop with these asinine make-believe holidays and start focusing on what really matters?
  14. Duncan Edwards wrote the following post at 15 Dec 2016 7:46 PM: "Well when you stump up your half a million, you can give the kids baked beans and porridge for Xmas." Nice, you must still believe in Santa, yes? I also trust that you''re nicely sitting in your toasty warm flat after consuming your 1500 calorie tea.
  15. Dan Dare wrote the following post at 15 Dec 2016 4:25 PM: "a very generous gesture" £500,000 could be better spend on food donations rather than on toys. Toys don''t feed empty stomachs.
  16. lake district canary wrote the following post at 08 Jul 2016 10:01 PM: Yes, he was wrong, but it''s easy to forget what those times were like, the uncertainty, the terror, the sheer feeling of wanting to do something to try and fight against tyranny and terror. Nice hyperbolic rhetoric LDC. The US and UK were the purveyors of tyranny and terror in this case and look at the results today. Onward, christian soldiers, marching as to war.......
  17. Branston Pickle wrote the following post at 09 Jul 2016 1:28 PM: 1-0, Bennett - Josh seems to be getting a lot of mentions I''m thinking that he knows that this might be his last chance of gaining a foothold into the regular team. If not, he''s most likely to look elsewhere a la Canos.
  18. lake district canary wrote the following post at 09 Jul 2016 10:07 AM: He was looking at a way of supporting the US in their - and our - battle against terroism He may have been wrong, but I can''t believe his motivation was anything other than honourable. "He was looking at a way of supporting the US in their - and our - battle to remain as rogue states." Fixed that for you.
  19. I''m hearing that it''s the French that are attacking everyone. When''s the first time that you able to say that?
  20. lappinitup wrote the following post at 09 Jun 2016 3:31 PM: E.L.F. wrote: If Dorrans leaves then we''s be in big trouble. Is there a transfer embargo that says we can''t sign any new players? That''s quite the extrapolation from what I said. So am I to understand that losing 50% of the experienced DM''s in a span of a couple of weeks poses no problems? Let''s see, now we need defenders, defensive midfielders, LM/RM (should Brady/Redmond go) AND someone who can put the ball in the net on a consistent basis. Lovely having those parachute payments.
  21. The Great Wall Of Tettey wrote the following post at 09 Jun 2016 3:11 PM: don''t think he would get in ahead of Howson, tettey and dorrans in the championship. Also got to bare in mind he was offered a 2 year contract and I can''t imagine us giving him more than a year, and a far easier commute than he''s currently doing! Tettey is nowhere able to handle a 46 match season. Take away his guaranteed yellow card bans that''s still 20 matches more than he could fully contribute to. If Dorrans leaves then we''s be in big trouble.
  22. Ian wrote the following post at 09 Jun 2016 10:48 AM: A shame if true, but I imagine this is down to contract length offered. Let''s be honest, O''Neil did well for us, but only because of injuries did he end up becoming a mainstay. I agree, this comes as a bit of a shocker. Graham Dorrans, please step forward.
  23. morty wrote the following post at 08 Jun 2016 4:45 PM: Yes, obviously every single person at the club is sat at their desk, looking confused and a bit lost, and totally unable to do a single thing because we don''t have a chief exec. Jesus Christ. It''s the new and improved Mike Ashley school of business but with only one strike.
×
×
  • Create New...