Jump to content

SpA

Members
  • Content Count

    55
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Community Reputation

0 Neutral
  1. [quote user="Gingerpele"] King, no thanks. [/quote] Lol....just errrr.... lol.
  2. It would indeed seem that Carl is training with the team.Just watched the video on Canariesworld entitled ''Defender on recovery from injury'', which is an interview with Adam Drury on his return to training, however it shows some footage of Drury training with some of the players including Mr Cort.Gill is also there so it must be fairly recent
  3. the foreign loanee thing only applies to how many loanees can be named in a squad.which is 5 domestic loans plus 2 foreign
  4. I believe you can have a certain amount of loans under 23 and a certain amount above.Carney, sibi, kennedy etc were all above 23 so fall into that categoryand I cba to find the exact amount out :)
  5. [quote user="NCFC_Shaun"][quote user="SpA"][quote user="NCFC_Shaun"] [quote user="SpA"]I really dont follow people''s sudden obsession with Lappin, it seems to be a pretty poor excuse to get on Roeder''s back again. I have no problem with people giving him jip as it can be fully justified in other areas, but surely you cannot argue that Lappin has a place in the team? The only position I would even think about playing him is on the left wing and surely thats well covered by Bell, Hoolahan and Pattison and even Bertrand. I would also find it hard to argue that our season would have been any better with him in the squad throughout?[/quote] Because we have hardly any players and he still wont give Lappin a chance. We know Lappin has the ability to be a decent squad player we saw that in his first game. When he got man of the match... A players whole career at the club can''t be judged so heavily on one performance ... [/quote]Although he never really featured after the Plymouth game that doesnt automatically mean he was dropped because he played badly that one game[/quote]   [:|] Yes it does ... He got man of the match in the reserve game against Arsenal playing out of position. Still no sign of him ... Didn''t Roeder even admit the players are unlikely to feature again much after the Plymouth game? [/quote]I think the Plymouth game was just the nail in the coffin, I dont think he deserved his place in the squad at the time and noone had any problem with him being loaned out at the time, and our squad is looking particularly bare at the moment and theres no reason why he should not be stuck on the bench, we can agree on that... I just think a campaign like this is over the top! just my opinion!
  6. [quote user="NCFC_Shaun"][quote user="SpA"]I really dont follow people''s sudden obsession with Lappin, it seems to be a pretty poor excuse to get on Roeder''s back again. I have no problem with people giving him jip as it can be fully justified in other areas, but surely you cannot argue that Lappin has a place in the team? The only position I would even think about playing him is on the left wing and surely thats well covered by Bell, Hoolahan and Pattison and even Bertrand. I would also find it hard to argue that our season would have been any better with him in the squad throughout?[/quote] Because we have hardly any players and he still wont give Lappin a chance. We know Lappin has the ability to be a decent squad player we saw that in his first game. When he got man of the match... A players whole career at the club can''t be judged so heavily on one performance ... [/quote]Although he never really featured after the Plymouth game that doesnt automatically mean he was dropped because he played badly that one game, and although I would not have a particular problem with him going into the squad as I cannot argue that he is a bad player I just cannot see him adding anything. Simon Lappin not being in the squad is about number 467 in the list of problems at this club and just seems a bit weird people getting so upset about it....
  7. I really dont follow people''s sudden obsession with Lappin, it seems to be a pretty poor excuse to get on Roeder''s back again. I have no problem with people giving him jip as it can be fully justified in other areas, but surely you cannot argue that Lappin has a place in the team? The only position I would even think about playing him is on the left wing and surely thats well covered by Bell, Hoolahan and Pattison and even Bertrand. I would also find it hard to argue that our season would have been any better with him in the squad throughout?
  8. I know he may not be the answer to that problem but you did conveniently miss Carl Cort off that list
  9. [quote user="Rastaman"]Anselin you must be mentally retarded[/quote] Brilliant.
  10. AnselinI actually have to agree, Today was a loss, sure. But the boys matched a far superior team and on their turf for most of the game and deserved to get something out of the game.As for this season I can''t believe anyone expected anything more than what we are seeing, people accuse those that still support Roeder as being deluded however maybe they were deluded to think we would not be in such a situation this season. The permanent signings Roeder have made have been quality, if he can bring in one or two more quality signings in january and further signings in the summer that are of a similar quality then we will start to see the formings of a great team.
  11. Alan Pearce i think his name is, fitness coach
  12. [quote user="CT "]Rat-boy Roeder pi** off! That would be a good sign for a banner.... [/quote]"Rat-boy", how wonderfully witty!  Did you think that one up all by yourself?
×
×
  • Create New...