Jump to content

The ghost of Michael Theoklitos

Members
  • Content Count

    2,301
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Everything posted by The ghost of Michael Theoklitos

  1. [quote user="morty"]I think Huddersfield will drop off.[/quote]I remember 2 seasons ago when people kept saying the same thing about Bournemouth. I think Huddersfield are better than people are giving them credit for. Aaron Mooy was a great pick-up. Completely runs their show.I won''t be surprised one bit to see them in the mix at the end.
  2. [quote user="Donkey dangler"]Firstly we haven''t played the likes of Newcastle, Brighton etc yet. However even Burton exposed the weaknesses in our CB''s on Saturday. When we get promoted, Martin''s lack of pace will be really obvious like it was last season when he was found on many a time to be trotting back in the wake of his opponent.[/quote]What a fantastic problem to have! I hope you''re right!!
  3. [quote user="lake district canary"][quote user="Hoola Han Solo"]And if we get promoted, the jump he would have to make from SPL to PL, would be much harder. If you''re good enough you''re old enough. Lakey, you managed to contradict yourself in the space of three or four lines.[/quote]Maybe, but the premise is right imo. If we are promoted, we need him to have had at least some championship experience this season to make it easier to make the jump. The PL is a goldfish bowl of  unbelievable proportions. Every move is scrutinised and exagerated way beyond what is normal, to the point that pressure can have an effect on even the best young player.  The championship is a much better preparation for the PL than the Scottish SPl (witness the defending in that league and you''ll see what I mean).  I hope he comes back in January and is able to feature for us this season, but as I said, if we don''t sell any players in january, he will likely stay where he is for the duration. [/quote]But who''s to say if we were promoted this season, we''d need to throw Maddison in next season? As people point out, we have Wes & Pritchard. Perhaps he could further his development again out on load - this time at a higher level. Top of the Championship perhaps.One thing I''ve noticed the last few years is that we''re now prepared to be patient with young players. The handling of Louis Thompson is a great example of this, which is another one I''m more impressed with every time I see him. He signed when he was 19 (i.e. the same age as Maddison), and he''s now been on our books for 2 years. Only now is he starting to work his way in and around the first team.Like mentioned above - given the results we''re starting to see, I''m prepared to go with the clubs judgement on this. I mean your expert opinion is always appreciated, but I think the club knows what it''s doing.
  4. [quote user="Eccles from Beccles"]Doing well in the 15th ranked league in Europe means f all![/quote]I wish I was doing well in the 15th best league in Europe when I was 19.
  5. [quote user="morty"]Hmmmm, so had they not lost games, they would have had more points.*Strokes chin and nods*[:D][/quote]Sure. You could look at it that way.......but we only have 8 games to look at so far. The old adage "the table doesn''t lie" is never more untrue than at the start of the season.Anyway. I found it interesting. And I think we have a very interesting few weeks coming up with both us and Villa playing Newcastle in consecutive weeks. We''re going to know a lot more about where everyone really is by next Sunday.
  6. However getting back to the OP - I think it''s a mute point.I think any manager of this football club at the moment at any-time is at most 10 games from the sack given our expectations this season.For right or wrong, that''s the way of football these days.
  7. [quote user="morty"][quote user="The ghost of Michael Theoklitos"][quote user="morty"]I don''t see how anyone could be unhappy with that record so far.If you want to see it done wrong, take a look at Villa.[/quote]OT - but I read a decent article this morning about Villas start to the season when compared to that of Newcastle in preparation for them meeting on Saturday.It puts an interesting spin on the early seasons for both promoted teams, and I think is well worth a read.[/quote]That basically backs up my opinion before the season started, that hasn''t changed much.Newcastle, just by sheer weight of squad quality and financial dominance really shouldn''t fail in this league.And Villa are a car crash of a club.[/quote]I don''t disagree in regards to Villa. My observations from the article were more to do with - in all measurables other than league table points - how close both Villa & Newcastle actually are. Especially given that "had Villa not conceded the five goals they''ve let in during the final five minutes of matches so far this season they''d be level with Newcastle on 15 points." which when you consider the accusations of Norwich fans saying our players do not look fit at the end of games, gives some kind of perspective.I think the writer is clearly a little lazy in stating that these 2 clubs are the main 2 powerhouses of the league and were 1st and 2nd favourites for the league. But when I read between the lines, my main take away from this article (or more accurately, stat analysis) is - which of the 2 clubs is actually in the false position?
  8. [quote user="morty"]I don''t see how anyone could be unhappy with that record so far.If you want to see it done wrong, take a look at Villa.[/quote]OT - but I read a decent article this morning about Villas start to the season when compared to that of Newcastle in preparation for them meeting on Saturday.It puts an interesting spin on the early seasons for both promoted teams, and I think is well worth a read.
  9. [quote user="ZLF"][quote user="Barking Mad Barclay Boy"][quote user="Lessingham Canary"]Nice to see Oliviera being written off before kicking a ball...........[/quote] exactly tell me how many good touches hes had for us?![/quote] That''s the trouble, statistically he has the same number of bad touches as good, which really isn''t a good ratio is it?[/quote]Oliviera has not scored a single goal for Norwich!#statsdontlie
  10. [quote user="Icecream Snow"]Basically, he is this guy [url]http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2203460/Chelsea-Manchester-City-tracking-24m-Nelson-Oliveira.html[/url][/quote]I don''t think Oliveira would be a bad signing - but just to play devils advocate here;http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11667/7236208/united-tracking-van-wolfswinkel
  11. [quote user="OldRobert"][quote user="The ghost of Michael Theoklitos"]Can someone translate this for me please?I can''t speak moron.[/quote]Come on Michael, I thought you were multi-lingual![/quote]There are limits to how far my skills can take me though. And I think I''ve just found them [;)]
  12. I think someone has just been a little lazy at updating the website.According to that, we also still have Adel Gafaiti. With a squad number of 31. Same number as Josh Murphey.
  13. Can someone translate this for me please?I can''t speak moron.
  14. No new stories on this one today.I get the feeling this one may have never been a starter.
  15. [quote user="Hank shoots Skyler"]Does preferring Lafferty to come on for a tiring Jerome with 10 minutes to go (instead of nothing at all) make me a ''Lafferty lover''?[/quote]No I don''t think so. I think most people commenting on this thread have stated that he''d do a job as a 3rd or 4th option at this level.I think people get a little touchy though when talking about poor Laffs, due to there being those out there (like previous Canary Call love-ins the OP was alluding to) that still believe that he should have been played more last season, and that he''s the saviour to all our problems. I don''t think anyone on this thread is really subscribing to that theory - but you don''t need to go that far to find them.Current state - I don''t think anyone would argue with a 20min Laffs cameo. But the manager doesn''t seem to have had much faith in him so far this season. It will be interesting this weekend to see if Tuesdays game has changed that.
  16. I see this as a win/win if we go up there and play a similar side to the one that played Tuesday.If we lose as expected - we''re out of the League Cup with no more cup games to worry about until Jan, while the fringe players get a good run out against a strong team.If we get an unexpected win - the kids played well and handled the occasion of going to a big premier league club. They can enjoy a memorable night! Plus, we''re still in the cup, with the future looking more than rosy.
  17. [quote user="Hoola Han Solo"]He''s got the same sort of physique and height of Aguero. Could Jordan Rhodes be Norwich City''s Sergio Aguero?[/quote]lol [Y] [Y]
  18. [quote user="Hank shoots Skyler"]Whilst Lafferty had his fair share of poor touches he also showed plenty of decent link up play; both in the air and on the ground. To those of you that have criticized his quality on the ball, I''d like to know how you feel he compares to Jerome in this respect? I personally don''t think that there''s a great deal of difference, if anything Lafferty is more comfortable with the ball at his feet and spreading the play.[/quote]No. I disagree.Game of opinions ''n all that....
  19. [quote user="unique"]1 in 6 is not my definition of a good goal-scoring CF.[/quote]No it''s not.But 1 in 3 in the Championship last year is - and is pretty much just as good as Ross McCormick has done in his career in the same league.Like others have said - providing there is another plan B signing as well, I think this could have a good bit of business.
  20. [quote user="Move Klose"]http://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2016/08/24/gb-norwich-eye-nelson-oliveira-deal/?utm_medium=share%2Bbutton&utm_campaign=social%2Bmedia&utm_content=/en-gb/2016/08/24/gb-norwich-eye-nelson-oliveira-deal/[/quote]Thank you sir!
  21. "Linked with Norwich"A Google news search gives nothing Norwich related - so can we define what "Linked with Norwich" actually means by way of a link or something. 
  22. [quote user="ron obvious"]The feeling I get is that he''s not got much quality but can bully oppositions & is a decent finisher - probably better than Jerome. OK as third choice striker. Or fourth ...[/quote]This pretty much sums up my opinion of him.He worked hard tonight against a poor opposition, and took his easy finish well. He does have a presence, but at times lacked quality and composure on the ball last night. Quite a few poor first touches, and scuffed balls.He''ll do a job as a 3rd / 4th option, but nothing more. If he wants to be the main man somewhere, then I''d say League 1 would probably be his level.Talk of ''his goals'' keeping us up last year is laughable. He even ended up getting dropped when he want on loan to a struggling Birmingham team, where his only goal was a tap in from a ''keepers error.
  23. [quote user="nutty nigel"]And I guess he got a look at Josh playing central. He didn''t do too bad to be fair. But it was Coventry.[/quote]^^ This.He brought on Mulumbu so another young striker could have a go up front. It''s that that said young striker was already in midfield.We only play one up top at a time, which makes it hard for everyone to get a run.and I''m sure AN explained that so everyone knew their place.
×
×
  • Create New...