Chabal

Interest!

[quote user="Barbie"]Robbie Savage is apparently.[/quote] Norwich players obviously!

So who is put of contract at the end of the season?

Town fan here. Ian Harte did exactly the same thing to us way back in 2001 when he was playing for Leeds. Writhed around in ''agony'' and got Marcus Stewart sent off and banned. So you have my sympathy (not something you will hear me say very often!)

Just a question. P.S. Assuming there is no appeal, or it is unsuccessful..

Yes. There was a 3rd picture swimming about TWTD earlier which looked like both of them. Will try to find it.

If you like!

Difficult to get this through to you. I''ve seen him in the flesh. I know it''s him. And yes, he is 58. I''ll grant you he doesn''t look it, but he is. Sorry to disappoint.

[quote user="cityangel"][quote user="Chabal"][quote user="City1st"]The one in the light coloured jacket IS NOT Milne - it''s the spiv Evans. [/quote] Both of the guys in the front row have light jackets! The light brown one is Ian Milne. He was introduced to Ipswich shareholders in Dec 2007 when the takeover took place. I know, I was there! No idea who the guy in the blue jacket is. It could be Evans for all I know.[/quote] The man ( in his 40''s) in the light jacket directly in front of Edgar David is the one we''re talking about, he looks nothing like Ian Milne who is 58 years old (according to your website ) or am I missing something? [/quote] Evans is in his 40''s, yes. Milne is 57 I think. I did see him in the flesh a couple of years ago (Milne, not Evans) and the guy in the light brown jacket with a bit of a comb-over is definitely Milne.

[quote user="City1st"]The one in the light coloured jacket IS NOT Milne - it''s the spiv Evans. [/quote] Both of the guys in the front row have light jackets! The light brown one is Ian Milne. He was introduced to Ipswich shareholders in Dec 2007 when the takeover took place. I know, I was there! No idea who the guy in the blue jacket is. It could be Evans for all I know.

Sorry to disappoint. It''s Ian Milne, a board member. Second one down on the who''s who page http://www.itfc.co.uk/page/WhosWho/

[quote user="Scooby"][quote user="Scooby"] Oh how I love Fridays! Ok guys, not a joke but a conundrum.  See if you can work out a solution before reading mine in the next post. Can you complete a sentence using the word "and", five times in a row? (And no, it can''t be someones name before some smart arse says it[;)]) [/quote] The answer, in the form of a little story. The landlord of a little country pub called The Pig and Whistle arrived home one day and looked up at his pub sign which was looking a little dilapidated.  Time for a lick of paint he thought and went inside to phone Mick, the local painter and decorator.  The next day Mick arrived to do the job and the landlord popped out to the cash and carry and left him to it.  On his return a couple of hours later Mick was at the top of the ladder just finishing the name, painted very neatly accross the front of the pub.  It read PIGANDWHISTLE.  The landlord obviously went nuts. "Mick what have you done" he cried, "There are no spaces!  You have to have a space between Pig and and, And and and Whistle!!" TA DA! [/quote]   Very good, how about a sentence containing the word ''had'' 11 times consecutively? Smith and Jones were taking an exam on English language in which there was a question ‘There was a boy who had previously had a cold. Which sentence is correct about the boy? ''The boy had a cold''   OR The boy had had a cold’ Smith, where Jones had had had, had had had had. Had had, had had the examiner’s approval.  

Darren Huckerby will be 34 in April, but that doesn''t stop half of this board baying for his return.

[quote user="glove1"][quote user="Chabal"][quote user="glove1"][quote user="Chabal"] I can''t see anything offensive there! Ex town player says that beating Norwich was important to the Ipswich fans. Er, ok. [/quote] yeah and he goes to the local NORWICH paper and says it. knew it wouldnt take long before someone backs it up. [/quote]   you think that Wetlaske went to the local Norwich paper to say it. Or do you think they singled him out as an ex-Town player. If you want someone to blame then blame the paper! Idiot. [/quote]   idiot?? so when did i turn it personal onto you???  go and put you handbag away and jog back to your playground or pick on someone elses thread..... or come and find me tomorrow and call me an idiot in the murderers to my face. [/quote]   You know the saying; If the cap fits, wear it. And yours is definitely an idiot''s cap at the moment.

[quote user="glove1"][quote user="Chabal"] I can''t see anything offensive there! Ex town player says that beating Norwich was important to the Ipswich fans. Er, ok. [/quote] yeah and he goes to the local NORWICH paper and says it. knew it wouldnt take long before someone backs it up. [/quote]   you think that Wetlaske went to the local Norwich paper to say it. Or do you think they singled him out as an ex-Town player. If you want someone to blame then blame the paper! Idiot.

[quote user="pete_norw"][quote user="First Wizard"] In theory, could Lambo buy Lisbi without asking Colchester''s permission , as he''s only on loan there? [/quote] I think it would also depend weather Ipswich have a recall clause in the loan deal as well [/quote]   I would imagine we do have a recall clause. We would want to protect ourselves against injury crises and also keep the option of a sale open. He''s been told that he''s not in our plans.

[quote user="National express striking guard "][quote user="colufan"]Because he was under contract to us![/quote] Think you''ll find resigning means the contract ends. You could enforce his notice tho (gardening leave) so guess compensation is to stop that happening [/quote]   If that was true then why don''t players simply resign if they want to join another club?

Your chief exec referred specifically to wanting someone with experience at a big club with high expectations. Which to me means its not Adkins but could be Lambert (Celtic)

Troy Brown signed for Ipswich 2 weeks ago, implying that the person writing the second rumour has no idea what he is talking about.

[quote user="BlyBlyBabes"][quote user="Chabal"][quote user="BlyBlyBabes"][quote user="Chabal"][quote user="BlyBlyBabes"][quote user="Chabal"][quote user="BlyBlyBabes"] [quote user="johnjohnjohnnyjohn"]Us. But, being here after administration doesn''t make us the owners in any way, shape, or form. Delia and MWJ are the owners, legally its there club. You could argue that "morally" its ours but sadly that''s not going to make a difference.[/quote] Legally theirs but morally (and thus effectively ours - in the end)?. Now that''s an interesting channel to explore. OTBC [/quote] Morally, and thus effectively?! Sorry but the two terms couldn''t be more different. [/quote] Maybe you''ve never enjoyed occupying the moral high ground? It''s often a wonderfully empowering place. And sometimes powerful to boot. OTBC [/quote] No, it''s what people say when they don''t occupy the ACTUAL high ground, but still want to. It is a place that only exists in the mind of the losers. And I think you could do with looking up what ''moral'' means! [/quote] Would you say that the opponents who eventually forced out Robert Chase were occupying the moral high ground - or merely losers thinking they were? OTBC [/quote] I certainly wouldn''t say they occupied any MORAL high ground. What an arrogant thought. Like I said, look up what ''moral'' means before you use it in relation to a football club. And yes, they made life unpleasant enough for him that he sold his shares - TO A NEW OWNER, not to the fans. [/quote] Does moral have a particular meaning when used in relation to a football club, then? And.no. Robert sold his shares to Geoffrey Watling as I remember. Hardly ''a new owner''. OTBC [/quote]   I''m saying you don''t understand what moral means, aptly illustrated by your use of the word in this thread.   And Watling WAS a ''new owner'' because after Chase sold him the shares he then owned the club. Either way ''the fans'' didn''t own the club any more than they do now.

[quote user="BlyBlyBabes"][quote user="Chabal"][quote user="BlyBlyBabes"][quote user="Chabal"][quote user="BlyBlyBabes"] [quote user="johnjohnjohnnyjohn"]Us. But, being here after administration doesn''t make us the owners in any way, shape, or form. Delia and MWJ are the owners, legally its there club. You could argue that "morally" its ours but sadly that''s not going to make a difference.[/quote] Legally theirs but morally (and thus effectively ours - in the end)?. Now that''s an interesting channel to explore. OTBC [/quote] Morally, and thus effectively?! Sorry but the two terms couldn''t be more different. [/quote] Maybe you''ve never enjoyed occupying the moral high ground? It''s often a wonderfully empowering place. And sometimes powerful to boot. OTBC [/quote] No, it''s what people say when they don''t occupy the ACTUAL high ground, but still want to. It is a place that only exists in the mind of the losers. And I think you could do with looking up what ''moral'' means! [/quote] Would you say that the opponents who eventually forced out Robert Chase were occupying the moral high ground - or merely losers thinking they were? OTBC   [/quote]   I certainly wouldn''t say they occupied any MORAL high ground. What an arrogant thought. Like I said, look up what ''moral'' means before you use it in relation to a football club.   And yes, they made life unpleasant enough for him that he sold his shares - TO A NEW OWNER, not to the fans.    

[quote user="BlyBlyBabes"][quote user="Chabal"][quote user="BlyBlyBabes"] [quote user="johnjohnjohnnyjohn"]Us. But, being here after administration doesn''t make us the owners in any way, shape, or form. Delia and MWJ are the owners, legally its there club. You could argue that "morally" its ours but sadly that''s not going to make a difference.[/quote] Legally theirs but morally (and thus effectively ours - in the end)?. Now that''s an interesting channel to explore. OTBC [/quote] Morally, and thus effectively?! Sorry but the two terms couldn''t be more different. [/quote] Maybe you''ve never enjoyed occupying the moral high ground? It''s often a wonderfully empowering place. And sometimes powerful to boot. OTBC     [/quote]   No, it''s what people say when they don''t occupy the ACTUAL high ground, but still want to. It is a place that only exists in the mind of the losers.   And I think you could do with looking up what ''moral'' means!

Jamie Cureton. Tick, Tick, Tick, Tick

[quote user="BlyBlyBabes"] [quote user="johnjohnjohnnyjohn"]Us. But, being here after administration doesn''t make us the owners in any way, shape, or form. Delia and MWJ are the owners, legally its there club. You could argue that "morally" its ours but sadly that''s not going to make a difference.[/quote] Legally theirs but morally (and thus effectively ours - in the end)?. Now that''s an interesting channel to explore. OTBC [/quote]   Morally, and thus effectively?! Sorry but the two terms couldn''t be more different.

I think it''s telling that, from the last 5 seasons, he has spent half his time in League 2 and half in the Conference. The ages 23 - 28 should be some of the best in a footballers life. It''s odd that he should spend his prime years swimming between the 4th and 5th divisions