Jump to content

Joanna Grey

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited


Posts posted by Joanna Grey

  1. kick it off wrote the following post at 03/04/2015 8:59 AM:


    Farage called Muslims "the enemy within".

    Really? I''m presuming you read the whole thing then?


    “I think perhaps one of the reasons the polls show an increasing level of concern is because people do see a fifth column living within our country, who hate us and want to kill us."

    “So don’t be surprised if there isn’t a slight increase in people’s worries and concerns. You know, when you’ve got British, when you’ve got people, born and bred in Cardiff, with British passports, going out to fight for Isis, don’t be surprised if there isn’t an uptick in concern. There has been an uptick in concern, but does it make us a prejudiced people? No.”

    In contrast, he said, previous waves of immigration by Huguenots, Jews and Ugandan Asians became integrated in society while often maintaining private observance of their faiths and traditions.

    “There is an especial problem with some of the people who’ve come here and who are of the Muslim religion who don’t want to become part of our culture. So there is no previous experience, in our history, of a migrant group that comes to Britain, that fundamentally wants to change who we are and what we are. That is, I think, above everything else, what people are really concerned about.”


    "Prioritise social housing for people whose parents and grandparents were born locally" - Automatically discriminates against black and Muslim communities.

    Also discriminates against my children and my grandchildren as well as my wife was not born locally. It''s a scheme to help the less well off, those in low paid jobs to gain a home close to their place of work and relatives.


    There are a few examples. Farage thinks Mulsims are enemies, Farage says clearly that employers will be allowed to discriminate on the grounds of race, and that racial discrimination will be allowed under UKIp, taking us back to the 1930s, and UKIP''s MEP clearly states that the religious slaughter policy is aimed at Muslims.

    I think you are getting ''race'' and nationality mixed up a bit here. UKIP''s policies are aimed at developing the prospects of the people already resident here (from whatever ethnic background), not freeloaders from other countries (including whites!).

    If you think UKIP have an anti-Muslim policy I think you should try looking into the changes and projected changes the Conservatives have or want to bring in regarding immigration and various benefits. You tell me which particular community the plans of IDS and May hit hardest?

  2. kick it off wrote the following post at 01/04/2015 2:55 PM:

    "My nastiness is only directed towards UKIP, not any other party,,,

    ...f you vote for UKIP you are either a racist, or you''re too thick to see them for what they are."

    So by your reckoning it''s OK to vote for the Tories or Labour even though several of their Members have been convicted of sex offences including paedophilia.

    If you vote for the Tories or Labour you''re a paedophile according to you.

  3. He''s kind of amusing until he insults your accent, region, birthplace, etc. As he seems to be slowly working his way through the whole world his band of supporters must be getting ever smaller.

  4. nevermind wrote the following post at 19/01/2015 10:23 AM:

    "Magnus Ranthoprpe also works for the Swedish defense centre, a country were they burn mosques, not a good example to follow and take as a guide."

    Hardly surprising after the people of Sweden have had to put up with a massive immigrant crime wave engineered by the left wing Government.

  5. nevermind wrote the following post at 16/01/2015 4:44 PM:

    "So we need to change our housing policies, mix it up a little, a few more community events, mixing it at schools, no more faith schools, learning of other cultures does not mean you have to dilute your own with political correctness etc.etc. "

    You are saying ''we'' as if it is on the indigenous population to change and integrate. The problem here is it is the Muslims who do not want to integrate. They are the ones creating their own ghettos, turning them into nothing more than colonies of Pakistan. You will not be able to ban their Faith Schools, they will just set up in someone''s front room or suchlike.

    "Paris had nothing to do with Islam or Muslims, it had to do with cold blooded terror by a few criminal elements who were castigated by their own communities."

    OK, and if I told you the moon was made of cheese would you bring the wine to the party?

  6. nevermind wrote the following post at 11/01/2015 1:22 PM:

    "....we should not incite people who live in our midst, nobody is perfect in this world and far from changing people, we all have to live together eventually."

    So we should hand the country over to the Caliphate already?

  7. He is certainly bitter. He also makes hypocritical posts about nearly every other aircraft - F-22, F-35, Eurofighter, Flanker, Harrier, etc, etc. Note that the F-35 basically replaces the A-10 and F-16, both aircraft that he co-designed. This post is typical of a lot of people''s views of him;

    "Mr Sprey seems to have hardly anything positive to say about aircraft that he personally had no involvement in developing."

  8. FGS, Pierre Sprey, the designer of the F-16 rips into every aircraft (including the Flanker funnily enough) claiming that his baby is, and was, the best fighter aircraft ever made. Perhaps if the Americans had offered him the chance to design an improved version of his baby he would not be so outspoken in his abuse of every multi-role fighter flying today.

  9. There is a view, that I first heard from David Icke, that makes sense to me. It''s all about control and to increase control you have to have a reason. There is no doubt in my mind that by introducing an alien culture into another you will end up with friction. The fact that it does not take much for this alien culture to kick off makes it a lot easier for TPTB to then introduce draconian measures that have to be applied to ALL the population. Of course the law-abiding, sleep walking citizens will say there is nothing wrong with TPTB having access to our phone calls, emails and financial details if they are only trying to stop terrorism. They probably will not argue when their vehicles are tracked, their children microchipped and they can not enter a shopping mall without being body searched.

    I suppose that the big question is whether this was a plan hatched years ago or whether it''s just a series of really stupid decisions?

  10. Yet another link from a fruitcake site, what''s wrong with you?

    "Zero Hedge is a batshit insane Austrian economics-based finance blog run by a pseudonymous founder who posts articles under the name "Tyler Durden," after the character from Fight Club by Chuck Palahniuk. It has accurately predicted 200 of the last 2 recessions."

  11. mrs miggins wrote the following post at 20/12/2014 9:22 PM:

    "...we let Bennet go out on loan which was a terrible decision imo, not because he''s that great, but because he can give us that balance."

    We let him go out on loan because he''s a Right Winger and we already have a very good Right Winger and if we play two Right Wingers then we will be very unbalanced.

  12. I always look forward to the News reports on TV about e-cigarettes because they invariably are situated in a Pub where there is a table full of crap-jumpered beardy weirdos manically puffing away on their miniature light sabres as if it was their last.
  • Create New...