deadly darren

What can i say... We are finally back where we belong after nine long, long years!!!! Everyone must take credit for it all but noe more than Nigel for his brilliant tactial buys and loans and Delia and the board for finally doing what a Norwich board doesn''t, by backing the manager financially and personally!! Brialliant!!!! Now lets finish the season in style and walk off with the league... after all we won''t be in this league for a long, long time!!! Bring on Arsenal!! Well doen everyone!!!

My point is that racism towards black people is considered so bad due to the effects that this prejudice had upon their lives. It was not just name calling and the like but there was actual discrimination in the country. Now the country has changed and if anything there now seems to be positive discimination as opposed to any real negative prejudice. Racism is not also defined by just skin colour. Where there is racism/prejudice towards religious groups could they not just change their religion? Yes they could, but should they??? Any name calling is in principle wrong and is a type of prejudice but is there really any difference, as i have said earlier, between referring to someone as black, ginger, fat, thin, white in this day and age? The only difference may be if there is the actual intent to cause the person distress by referring to them in such a way.

Maybe others should take note that there is no real difference between calling someone calling another Scottish, black or ginger. The only difference seems to be people''s perceptions of what they mean. It seems clear through reading the thread that people are not thinking for themesleves but just accepting what they read. I am not condoning racism, far from it, but maybe people should think twice before they refer to any foreign player as a useless foreign b*****d! Also maybe people should think would there be the same ''outcry'' if it was a white player being called a useless white b*****d? I think not...