Jump to content

RobertRosariosBeefTomatoes

Members
  • Content Count

    66
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by RobertRosariosBeefTomatoes

  1. I remember the same being said about Mario Vrancic in his first few games and look how he ended up adapting. Can't write someone off this early.
  2. Of course, I'd be very worried if you spend your life in public unable to read basic body language! As a human, generally you should be able to understand basic human traits. If you think that a 'degree' is needed for this then I wish you all the best!
  3. You're missing the point. Body language is a result of circumstance generally and circumstance equally is reliant on commitment. Ifs and buts aren't really relevant. Probably wouldn't have started this thread either if we'd stayed up and not been godawful for months.
  4. You're seeing a buoyant team full of players who want to be at Norwich? No questions of any character? If genuinely so then I guess it is all about how we read certain behaviours.
  5. Waddle generally performed though. Berbatov was another but their performance levels made it a non-issue in general.
  6. I just know that if I walked around my job with such poor body language WHILST underperforming then I'd be spoken to. Fair enough if someone is performing, for example Buendia at times could be petulant, but it's the players who are not only underperforming but acting like they couldn't care less.
  7. You can wheel out all the stats you want about a game by why is it that such basic indicators such as a player's body language are ignored in football? Obviously not the only indicator but come on, when it's terrible body language matched with poor perfomances I would say that the management team aren't seeing the whole picture. So fed up with seeing players who don't want to play for Norwich, especially in the championship. On a separate but relevant comment against this, I have actually been impressed with Cantwell's attitude since returning. Whatever the motive, it's good to see and would like the flashes of ability to become more reliable.
  8. It was commented several times on Saturday that Farke had a team watching Rashica on Saturday. Probably explained why Rashica was closer to a 6/10 performance than the usual 4. I fail to see what he actually brings to the team, especially in comparison to the threat posed by Hernandez on the opposite wing. I'd personally bite their hand off but would anyone be sad to see him go?
  9. So unnecessary. In response to a personal post about becoming a dad. Quite ashamed for the person who wrote it.
  10. That's the main concern for me. This is behaviour that he deems ok to actually be viewed. What goes on when the camera isn't on? Also widely known that psychotic behaviour start with animal abuse and is often indicative of other misgivings. Says a lot about this person's character.
  11. I want to keep it short rather than rambling but the point I want to highlight is the furor of the BK8 sponsorship deal at the start of the season. It was made incredibly clear that after the outrage surrounding the sponsor's Instagram by the club's hierarchy that the Lotus deal would equate to considerably lower finances for this season. It's almost inevitable that a large proportion of fans complaining about lack of signings are also those who were aware of the moral trade off. This then goes towards the envious glances towards the North East and the clamor for Norwich to seek out similar investment despite the extreme human rights question marks over this regime. The main question is, as fans is there a place for conscience in football when competing at the top table? Would Norwich fans genuinely seek to do anything to make sure such a takeover didn't happen or does the end justify the means?
  12. As long as Farke isn't in charge of any defence he will be fine.
  13. I think Barden showed he is the future NCFC number one and hopefully he will have a speedy recovery as I was comfortable with him deputising for Krul. For the Watford game I would like to see McGovern play.
  14. Are we deluded to think it's a given that Pukki will just want another season in the Championship on reduced wages? His loyalty can't be questioned by Norwich fans and neither can the fact he scores goals with so little opportunity and this is highlighted by the company he keeps in the PL top scorers list below even in the most depressing season for a decade. I would say more than most, Pukki is clearly a family man and also an intelligent man and the negativity surrounding every Norwich performance will clearly be making the enjoyment of playing for us somewhat reduced. Add to that, we are in a world cup year (we all know the comments from his national coach after our last relegation) Are we going to see Pukki want to move to a team to secure not only premier league football for himself either as a back up at higher level team (Leicester / West Ham) which he clearly has the talent for, or a side with finance such as Fulham and secure one last big pay day on a longer contract at that wage. For me, I wouldn't begrudge him and although I would be absolutely gutted I don't think it's as unlikely as a lot of people seem to think.
  15. Apparently one of a number of clubs in for QPR striker Lyndon Dykes. With an eye on the championship it would make sense as he's a handful but for me but also highlights where we are as a club. Would you be happy with him joining?
  16. I do apologise for not checking the pinkun forum every day. I shall try and do better going forward
  17. Would you take a punt on free agent Jack Wilshere? No club, training regularly with Arsenal. Undoubted quality if kept fit. Being realistic in where we are shopping at the moment.
  18. It's a sensible move to prepare him for the league and regular games when we are back down next season.
  19. Because without it he would be randomly knocking on doors. Lay off for 5 minutes.
  20. Anyone would think their populations are more widely spread apart over a larger area of land.
  21. You mention reasonable debate but you're responding with the same sensationalist attitude mentioning regimes. Please explain clearly what you think the benefits are to the 'rich and powerful' from hammering the economy.
×
×
  • Create New...