Mr_Biff1961

You don't read anything do you. you just spout drivel. The panel is not there for supporters issues to be fed to, if there is anything needs raising or concerns, contact the club and then it will be dealt with , and if appropriate discussed at a panel meeting. Otherwise time would be wasted on individual gripes rather than whole picture

@Greavsy was in no means trying to disparage you in any way! Posting the agenda should have resulted in many thanks and not a debate! Thanks for posting the agenda, look forward to the minutes in due course! OTBC!

As a former member, although input is potentially needed, if every member bought 1 item would result in 11 additional topics which is not really viable. If supporters have issues, they have the ability and should feed these directly to the club The panels purpose is as a sounding board for the club and for them to float ideas and proposals before release to a supporters. Also some issues discussed are confidential and don't appear on agenda or minutes.

This was discussed at a supporters panel meeting. Danny Casey has been pretty close in selecting the allocation for away games as was demonstrated by the away allocation selected, what was sold and which groups it went on sale to. With the exception of Ipswich, which went to group two, all others either did not sell out or went on general sale. This is the reason that now potentially groups 1, 2 and 3 will be sold together as past ticket sales indicate that all in those groups will get a ticket if they want one. this allows family’s or friends in different groups to buy together and sit together. when we are promoted, I can see a change back to the purchase days, which still rewards the groups as before. i cannot comment on home games as this was not discussed.

I am sure we signed a non disclosure agreement at the start,,, but somebody would sign with vanishing ink!

@GMF or even as happened, the increase was lower than proposed and there would be complaints that it’s less than what was minuted! it’s laughable that someone would think releasing confidential discussions is for the greater good!

You really are an idiot, do you engage brain before typing??? so at a meeting which was called to discuss season ticket price increases, there were lots of considerations proposed for the panel to discuss. These were then taken back to the board for further discussion. according to you, these proposals should have been immediately disclosed to the fan base and not kept confidential as requested by the club? at our last ever panel meeting, we were all complimented that any confidential matters which were discussed were never disclosed or released on any social media platforms. this must be the reason why nothing is released to you and you are not welcome to any meetings.

I was warned against engaging with you. The badge design was shown to several groups prior to release, this was confidential until it was leaked by the press. the membership discussion was on tweaks to the scheme and how it could be improved, suggestions for improvements were discussed and considered. the reason they are not disclosed is some changes will not take place as to costly or only affect a few members.

Unseen because there were many confidential issues along with projects that were discussed ( such as the changes in badge, membership changes) that were to be released at a later date.

Try just park or Park in my drive, usually a lot cheaper!

The music at half time is clear so it’s an issue with commentary.

A very good shortlist, hopefully lots of diverse characters with skills similar to the original 12 and replacement 6!

Having been a previously elected member, we were extremely effective on several areas. Unfortunately the only way you would find out is to be elected and see the process in action

So additional cost to the clubt to elect 6 new members?

Speculation again? It was 16 not around 20 so where was the over 100 obtained from. its democracy in action, for elections, the individual parties whittle down the applicants to a short list and then the local party members vote from this shortlist who is to be put forward for the public vote. the club looked at all applicants and selected a diverse group for the supporter election. so are you proposing all that apply should go into the election?