Jump to content

Matt_1

Members
  • Content Count

    188
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Posts posted by Matt_1


  1. [quote user="norfolkngood"]i think Dennis will be a good player for us next season as long as Farke does not drop him every game after he scores !

    i have said this before but NO has had chance after chance this season Dennis had a good game vs Villa scores his first go then gets dropped

    Reward success not failure[/quote]

    This. The only sensible post in this thread.

    Anyone seeing his interviews after the game could tell he was high on confidence...as one would expect.

    Tiredness ?No way. Start him next game...take him off after 65-70 if you need to.

    Oliveira = chance after chance. Hope everyone is happy to have kept him over Cam now :-(


  2. i think it''s hugely amusing how much support N.O. has got.

    Is it because he is a Portugese International? Has played alongside Ronaldo? Does he have a flair and swagger that makes him look the real deal?

    So, he''s turned up for work the last couple of games...excellent. Will he turn up for the rest of the season? who knows. Will he score again this season? Eventually yes.

    Does he offer more as a non-scoring striker than Jerome? Not in a million years.

    Yes I am a Jerome lover, and nothing has swayed this since he has left. I would have loved to see him offered the faith that N.O. has been given over the last god knows how many games. If Jerome a couple of starts without scoring he was dropped.

    Back onto topic - YES Srbeny should been given some games - I don''t see anything in N.O.''s personality that we would lose by him not being in the starting line up or in the dressing room.

    We need to be scoring more - and there is no disputing that.

  3. Smeby or Oliveira or Jerome

    Not even considering the review from today, the stats speak for themselves, and I can''t believe the NO support on here.

    If this was Jerome they''d be calling foe his head 10 games ago. NO offers nothing 90% of the time. The stats aren''t even striker stats. Drives me mad for every game he plays :-(

    I would rather play some U17 striker. Zero risk vs no goals anyway.

  4. [quote user="Salford City YELLOW"]would you rather be a professional footballer or a scaffolder?[/quote]

     

    totally agree, but it''s still a knock back from being a 20+ a season striker to trying to keep your place on the bench...

     

    ...i think to be honest , he has done ok, otherwise he wouldn''t be on the bench with Johnson.  hopefully he is still part of the plan.


  5. Sorry i really did look for a thread on this but didn''t see one so sorry thread repeat haters.

     

    I know Cody has had a lot of fans and a lot of people who also think he hasn''t cut it, but how much does this kill a strikers confidence?

     

    He was brought in from a lower league with more confidence and fight than any single player, and now i would think is struggling to hold on to his place on the bench.

     

    It sounds like he is trying to stay positive from the interviews had with him, but with Johnson surely now 1st reserve, he must be prety pee''d off, as anyone would.

     

    Is it time to send him out on loan?  I just can''t see him getting even his traditional 2 minutes any more now.

     

    I for one was a fan.  Thought he could do a good job alongside Holt, but -lucky for us - bad for him - he never got a proper shot.

     

    Loan out time??


  6. Why are there so many people on here who want to just accept the result?

     

    Yes we lost AND we will have games like this.. i agree.   BUT what we want is the manager to get upset that we played so poorly and with such little desire.  If he didnt want to win...he wouldn''t have risked playing almost the entire first 11.

     

    Why would you not get upset if your team lost?  especially in the manner that we did.

     

    I would want:

    a reaction from the manager over the 24 hours following the game, that it bothers him too, and what he and the players have learnt from this defeat.

    An apology to those who went all that way to support the team.

    And we want a reaction from the players...which we can only hope for on Tuesday now.

     

     

    In the meantime, i AM one of those upset that we lost.  I don''t think i would be a football fan if i didnt.  Sorry if that seems to buck the trend on here! ;-)

     

    Matt


  7. It is certainly a hike from the £7 it cost me to see them beat Chippenham in the last round!!

    I know its all about making money but feel a bit sorry for their small band of loyal supporters!  Hope they have some sort of discount. 

    Or are home supporters tickets usually different price anyway?


  8. Thought it might be of interest to anyone who fancies their chances of getting a ticket... Or anyone wondering about players/pitch/ground etc.

     

    Good quality pics from the regular Chippenham photographer here...

    http://rich735.smugmug.com/CHIPPENHAM-TOWN-FOOTBALL-CLUB/2009-2010-SEASON/CHIPPENHAM-TOWN-V-PAULTON/10089676_jTsG2#692476563_mqR8M

     

    Oh and as a reminder...this is with about 900 in the ground...

     

    Oh and one final thing.. the last few pics...may look like all Paulton supporters are under 16 yrs old and from the local council estate and as gobby as hell??.....absolutely correct.

    Cheers

    Matt


  9. [quote user="ryan1992"]does anybody know if the meeting went ahead today regarding the venue of paulton game? if so do you know how it went?[/quote]

     

    Meeting now tomorrow morning with FA, according to website now...

     

    "We have been earmarked by Sky TV as one of their live games and we are having a meeting with the FA tomorrow (NB now likely to be Tuesday morning) to ensure we can host the tie. We definitely want to hold it here and we don''t see any problems."


  10. [quote user="Kidderminster Canary"]just watched Points west news, Paulton manager says they want it at home, meeting with police tomorrow re capacity, may be up to 3500 - 4000 no mention re sky coverage[/quote]

     

    Also website confirms meeting with FA to make sure all is ok, is now on Tuesday morning....

    "We have been earmarked by Sky TV as one of their live games and we are having a meeting with the FA tomorrow (NB now likely to be Tuesday morning) to ensure we can host the tie. We definitely want to hold it here and we don''t see any problems."

     

    Not seen anything anywhere else to confirm or deny tv coverage though.


  11. [quote user="......and Smith must score."][quote user="Matt"]

    [quote user="Canary_on_the Trent"]The Paulton chairman has been on and says the authorities may not allow the game to be played at their place, would it be moved to Ashton Gate? Would certainly allow us to take a far larger following but does lose the feel about the cup[/quote]

     

    Any idea how they are allocating tickets yet??  I went to watch Paulton V Chippenham yesterday.....and still have my stub!!

    [/quote]

    According to their web site - assuming they actually stage the game at Winterfield Rd -  it sounds as though you''re in luck ( with conditions ). The good news is that top priority willdaybe given to those with a Chippenham stub.......the bad news is you''ll have to go again on Saturday as they''re giving out vouchers at the Taunton game !!

    [/quote]

    Thanks, just looked at that.  Was hoping the stub might carry some weight in gaining a ticket.. looks like its stubs plus being a member though which is to be expected...will have to see if they move it first now.


  12. [quote user="Canary_on_the Trent"]The Paulton chairman has been on and says the authorities may not allow the game to be played at their place, would it be moved to Ashton Gate? Would certainly allow us to take a far larger following but does lose the feel about the cup[/quote]

     

    Any idea how they are allocating tickets yet??  I went to watch Paulton V Chippenham yesterday.....and still have my stub!!

×
×
  • Create New...