Jump to content

Hairy Canary

Members
  • Content Count

    3,770
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Hairy Canary

  1. If you based it on yesterday’s performance we’d only be keeping Gunn
  2. No of course not. I was making a point about the respective strengths of the squads and that maybe Wagner needs to be cut a bit of slack.
  3. Could have been much worse. We’re still in the playoffs, tough game out the way and plenty to look forward to! Exciting times ahead All the best, Humongously Hung Hairy Canary…
  4. Leicester bring on Vardy and we decided not to use SVH
  5. I imagine he’s thinking, if only I could pass the ball I’d be a shoe in
  6. We haven’t got the players to get past Leicester, Leeds or Southampton
  7. Paul Lambert. Everyone thought he was the messiah but he turned out to be a very naughty boy.
  8. One match does not a POTS make. I agree the vote has been opened too early though, and for only two weeks. Last season I only found out on the last day!
  9. Yes me too. That’s why I voted for Kenny
  10. Been done to death but “Super Caley go ballistic, Celtic are atrocious” will surely never be bettered?
  11. They are tougher set of fixtures than I’d realised. I’d say somewhere between 12 and 15 points. I think Leeds will better that but Leicester need to pull their fingers out after Monday or they have fũċked it right up.
  12. The only team I really don’t want is Leeds. I think we’d have more chance against any of the others
  13. Fair enough. From where I sat thought it was the ref doing it urgently after he saw it was a head injury but I probably wasn’t looking at the keeper. Generally though I thought he was one of the best refs we’ve seen here this season.
  14. I think their complaint was that the ref called the trainer on because it was a head injury. The player didn’t want the trainer.
  15. I’m sure I was there WOAS. My memory says it was against QPR but there was a similar incident involving Stan Bowels playing for them so I might be getting them mixed up. 🤔
  16. Yes I’d say something very similar to that. Should be easy shouldn’t it, but then again I don’t think the sun shines out of his porthole.
  17. I agree with all that norfolkngood except for the bit in bold. I’m afraid this is what Corporate Governance is all about. Delia got so indignant about it when asked about it in that recent interview with MA present. There should be checks and balances in place to stop this sort of thing happening. A very senior employee making unwise media comments about other club employees without having to have that passed first by someone at the club shouldn’t be allowed to happen. Likewise there should be a gagging order in place so that SW cannot comment on NCFC without their permission once he has left. It’s common practice and something I bet SW would insist on himself. Im afraid it looks like it’s all been taken on trust and friendship without the need for anything corporately binding. It’s the very root of that questing that was brushed aside too easily.
  18. Someone at the club is going to have to comment. They’ve been asked to by Kick it Out, the media are all over it and as it stands Webber is still one of our employees, albeit working his notice on gardening leave. At the very least we need to disassociate ourselves from his comments. We promote ourselves as an inclusive community club, and this flys in the face of that image. Ordinarily the majority shareholders would be the perfect people to respond because it is they that foster the family friendly NCFC brand. Unfortunately because they have tied themselves to SW so openly in recent interviews by suggesting he was hounded out by the 20%, that isn’t going to be as easy as it should be. That’s lack of governance coming back and biting you on the bum.
  19. Free speech also means being able to say you disagree with what has been said.
  20. Exactly this! If not for football then the alternatives could be literally anything, good and bad. To single out prison and those specific people seems a really strange comment to me.
  21. I guess this is unusual because of Bayern sniffing around before Tzolis has signed permanently for Düsseldorf. Seems he has no option of saying no to a permanent deal with them in preference to a big wage increase with the German giants. And incidentally potentially a bigger fee for us.
  22. Thanks WWIAFTM, I hadn't realised that was the case. I guess Tzolis had to agree his future wages and length of contract with Dusseldorf before he moved there on loan then. No wonder these things take so long to agree!
  23. The buy out option may be there but Tzolis would also need to agree to the move to Düsseldorf for it to take place. With some of the big guys hovering around that might not be so straightforward if he prefers a move to one of those.
×
×
  • Create New...