LQ

Very high, expensive ones?[:P]

Surallun can''t afford me.

It''s on the front page of this site.Weird!

As a happy pill to us? He''s priceless![:P]

...and whatever you say some people won''t believe it so probably best not to bother!

[quote user="Bexley"][quote user="LQ"]Right.Let''s get this straight because I think it''s important. Long sentence coming up:At a time when the world is in the middle of economic collapse and no-one has shown any interest in ''saving'' our ''once great club'' nor ''restoring it to it''s rightful place''... sorry - excuse me a minute while I stop laughing at the irony... you would be happy to see us looking at August with minus ten points, no team (because anyone we do own would have been sold by the administrators and we can''t trade whilst in administration), desperately flailing around looking for someone, ANYONE!!! to put some money up (a very large amount of money because we''d have a minumum of 20 players to buy and a whole structure to rebuild), local traders struggling and even going under, just to ''get rid of Smith'' so you can say "I told you so"?That''s what you''re saying is it? [/quote]   Staggering, isn''t it? [/quote]Yep.And to think I''ve dared to question some people''s definition of the word "fan".

What a surprise.Adam Aiken tows NCISA party line shocker...

Right.Let''s get this straight because I think it''s important. Long sentence coming up:At a time when the world is in the middle of economic collapse and no-one has shown any interest in ''saving'' our ''once great club'' nor ''restoring it to it''s rightful place''... sorry - excuse me a minute while I stop laughing at the irony... you would be happy to see us looking at August with minus ten points, no team (because anyone we do own would have been sold by the administrators and we can''t trade whilst in administration), desperately flailing around looking for someone, ANYONE!!! to put some money up (a very large amount of money because we''d have a minumum of 20 players to buy and a whole structure to rebuild), local traders struggling and even going under, just to ''get rid of Smith'' so you can say "I told you so"?That''s what you''re saying is it?

That''s what I find almost unbelieveable MF.Almost.They''d rather be right than see success in any form they don''t 110% agree with.That''s just sad.

I could be way off the mark here (although I doubt it), but it seems to me, Wiz, as if you''d be happy if this did happen?Y''know - starting the season on minus ten (at least), foundering through the transfer window unable to buy and having every possible asset sold from under us, in the current financial climate possibly not even having a team of U12s to field in the league next season and being disqualified etc etcSurely that''s not worth being able to say "look at me, I was right..." about?Surely not.

The difference is that I don''t care more about being proved right than I do about this club. Unfortunately both the internet and Carrow Road have more than their fair share of people who do and I find that ridiculous.All the "ha, see, we got relegated/put into administration, I was right about Roeder/Grant/Delia/Worthy!!!" brigade can take a running jump off a high bridge as far as I''m concerned.You''re a scaremonger.

Wiz, there''s a difference between the waking and the dreaming state.The sooner you realise that (even in some shamanic, mind-altering way) the better.Why do you insist on posting everything that appears out of your hat with absolutely zero proof, credence nor validation?Scaremongering. That''s all you''re doing. Scaremongering.

It''d just be nice for the team I''m backing to WIN something for a change and yesterday should have been a nailed on, high five kinda game.I suppose thinking about the connotations of the Twenty20 is like worrying about how we fare in pre-season friendlies. If it goes your way you take it - if it doesn''t you dismiss it?Oh well. Roll on Tuesday...

[quote user="Branston Pickle"][quote user="LQ"]...and England lose to Holland (wtf???) in the first Twenty20.It''s going to be a long summer! [/quote] ...pathetic, really, isn''t it - we now need to win vs Pakistan to have a chance of going through in a game where the weather looks the most likely winner (indeed, I am going on Sunday - probably the very reason for the crappy forecast!).  But what can you expect - we''ve got completely the wrong captain (should be Key) and a ropey mid-order when Mr Ego isn''t playing -  Shah just is not good enough for internationals. [/quote]I''m still getting my head around it.Not sure what''s more strange - us in League One or ''us'' losing to Holland at cricket?You''re right about Shah though. Brainachingly stupid idea putting him in.

...and England lose to Holland (wtf???) in the first Twenty20.It''s going to be a long summer!

I did like the odd Wotsit.But weren''t they maize rather than potato?Yours sincerely,Ms Pedant.[;)]

As a follow up to my previous posts on here...1) The SPL are finding the money that Setanta can''t to pay clubs in order to stop ''several'' of them from finding themselves in financial difficulties.2) KPMG are obviously not optimistic that Hicks and Gillett can refinance their £350million in the current economic climate. If they can''t it begs the question as to how any normal billionaire could renegotiate our loans (after riding up on their white charger and saving us from the clutches of evil) doesn''t it?

[quote user="Sports Desk - Pete"][quote user="LQ"]He''s not taking any prisoners is he?[:S] [/quote] Quite, here''s hoping he doesn''t get Heggs on his face.... [/quote]Boom tish!I''ll set ''em up...

Peartree, that may all be publicly available info but I''m not sure that posting private addresses on a messageboard was a good idea?Face - the number of replies is probably due to me stirring in the first place ;~) (obviously that was said in a blowing my own trumpet kinda way!)

Awww...Come on.This is just too easy for a Friday evening.Soothsayer, what''s your log in on that defunct messageboard? Only from there would you dare question my history.First up, if backing someone who has influence over how your team perform (ie the manager) is a sin then I''m guilty as charged. Hell yes, I''d rather back them while they''re there. Otherwise what? Hoping they fail? Isn''t that then hoping my team fail? I could never do that. Never.Secondly why on earth would I ''stick up for'' Neil Doncaster? Nothing in this thread is sticking up for him, he''s big enough and ugly enough to look after himself! I''m questioning the motives behind bringing the ''fact'' that ''apparently'' certain forms haven''t been lodged with Companies House to their attention and indeed, to yours. The only thing this could hurt is the club I love to support. Hey, so shoot me!

Yeah, ok.Some of you lot use a strange definition of the word ''fan''.I''ll leave you all to undermine and batter the evil that pervades our club then - in your own time. I''ll just keep my fingers crossed that the ones who are going to the strangest lengths to do this have very deep pockets.

He''s not taking any prisoners is he?[:S]

It won''t affect me personally at all, why would it?What it could affect is our football club. I ask again what TFA is trying to achieve - a fine (great, even less money in the pot), a CH investigation (fabulous, just what we need in the transfer window), sh*t stirring (yep - sounds about right!)

Not at all Butler. I was just clicking around on the interweb while I was bored this morning.We''ve moved on to a whole new level now though. I didn''t realise investigating the legal shenanigans of public figures/bodies was part and parcel of being a supporter. If it is, Cam if you''re reading this, I have a story for you!

Actually I was thinking about costs like Colney and the match related infrastructure at Carrow Road.You two can think about restaurants if you like.