-
Content Count
15,548 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
14
Branston Pickle last won the day on November 26 2023
Branston Pickle had the most liked content!
Community Reputation
3,651 ExcellentRecent Profile Visitors
-
Wow, you just won’t have it, will you. The fact here is simple: he was offside, it was given immediately - I saw it from the Barclay - and what happened after that is irrelevant. The ref’s whistle went as/before the shot was made. In terms of ‘offsides’ we didn’t get away with anything on Saturday, however much you appear to want it to be otherwise.
-
Additional Birmingham Tickets On Sale Tomorrow.
Branston Pickle replied to TIL 1010's topic in Main Discussion - Norwich City
Well QPR was a definite sell-out, that’s for sure. -
Not watching but just called up the live text and saw that Leeds were losing. It is odd that all of the top 3 are struggling for form.
-
Could we relegate Birmingham?
Branston Pickle replied to cambridgeshire canary's topic in Main Discussion - Norwich City
I’m rather hopeful that, if we and they need a draw, it is what we both get. That said, we do owe them one… -
No, it didn’t. That just isn’t correct, plain and simple. Our goal was onside*, their ‘second’ didn’t make it to the highlights so I can’t say, but the flag was up well before the shot was made and it is simply irrelevant. *At the time I thought it was onside, the linesman and ref said it was onside, and the goal stands. It was onside. Why are some so determined that it wasn’t?
-
We didn’t, that is the point. As I said, some people - you clearly included - seem to have to come up with ‘oh, but…’ comments as if to excuse us from getting a result. It is weird. It was not offside. End of.
-
Forest have had enough
Branston Pickle replied to cambridgeshire canary's topic in Main Discussion - Norwich City
Thing is I don’t think they are corrupt, just inept and poor at their jobs. If anything, Var has underlined just how bad refereeing is in general. -
Today's other games
Branston Pickle replied to dylanisabaddog's topic in Main Discussion - Norwich City
The answer for me is that we need to (re)introduce the ‘benefit of the doubt’ favouring the attacker. For var, lines drawn should be much wider for the defender and narrow for the attacker. Level is onside, the toe of a boot doesnt, for me, constitute the player being clearly ahead of the defender. -
Forest have had enough
Branston Pickle replied to cambridgeshire canary's topic in Main Discussion - Norwich City
The first was one of those that ‘might’ be given, the other two look pretty clear-cut - that var didn’t feel there was enough to intervene on either is very poor. The weird thing is Forest having taken Clattenberg on as consultant, it hasn’t exactly changed their fortunes, has it?! -
Coventry fans pride
Branston Pickle replied to Coneys Knee's topic in Main Discussion - Norwich City
That is a classic case of where the lines should be thicker - benefit of the doubt should always go with the attacker, currently it is weighted the other way. -
Cardiff City suing Nantes
Branston Pickle replied to cambridgeshire canary's topic in Main Discussion - Norwich City
Utterly bizarre- how is it the fault of Nantes? Cardiff have behaved poorly over this , and look like a complete and utter bunch of a-holes. -
Today's other games
Branston Pickle replied to dylanisabaddog's topic in Main Discussion - Norwich City
Coo - that will surely get them into trouble, but 3 pens not given is rather on the harsh side. -
I do wonder why so many seem to try to find something to worry about…whenever we win it’s always ’oh, but they created so many chances’, this time it’s ’oh, but our goal was offside’. It wasn’t. If Leicester’s goal against us earlier this season was onside, so was this one.